Also, you may want '--disable-libffi'
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I'm not sure, but it's possible that a newer version of libtool is
> needed.
>
> Meanwhile, does dropping the `--enable-shared` flag help? (I recommend
> that in any case, unless you specifically need
I'm not sure, but it's possible that a newer version of libtool is
needed.
Meanwhile, does dropping the `--enable-shared` flag help? (I recommend
that in any case, unless you specifically need a libracket shared
library.)
At Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:33:59 -0400, HP Wei wrote:
> I replaced ‘-KPIC’ with
I replaced ‘-KPIC’ with ‘-fPIC’ in all instances in the files that you listed.
Start from a new build/; configure … ; make —> still get the same error.
Then after the above failure, I noticed:
libtool —config | grep pic_flag
pic_flag= “ -KPIC -DPIC”
libtool —config | grep CC
CC=“cc”
So, s
First of all, +1 for this stuff being confusing. I’ve been implementing
a language lately that needs its own lexer, reader, runtime
configuration, etc., and while the Racket docs are usually very good,
this stuff is sprawled out across the guide, the reference, the docs for
syntax/module-reader, th
On 6/29/2016 6:00 PM, hpwe...@gmail.com wrote:
I downloaded racket 6.5 sources
to a Sun's Sparc machine running Solaris (SunOS 5.11)
gcc version = 4.8.1
in the build directory, I did these two steps:
../configure --prefix=/a/path --enable-shared
make
--> It exited with the following error mess
I’m running into what look like some bugs in the interactions between typed and
untyped code. Specifically, I’m getting errors that look like this:
ct-error: Message: Record-role: contract violation
expected: Record?
given: (Record "test-class" "masteru...@example.com" (Record 0 "Instructor"
I'm trying to rewrite `make-meta-reader` to hopefully make more sense.
A racket #lang language normally defines and provides a `get-info` function in
its reader module along with `read` and `read-syntax`. However, there seems to
be very little documentation about what this is supposed to do, and
I downloaded racket 6.5 sources
to a Sun's Sparc machine running Solaris (SunOS 5.11)
gcc version = 4.8.1
in the build directory, I did these two steps:
../configure --prefix=/a/path --enable-shared
make
--> It exited with the following error message:
cd sgc; make ../libmzgc.la
make[7]: Enterin
Just for fun, if you want to be a little bit naughty, you can define
a custom #%top transformer that will make unbound identifiers that
are fully qualified automatically resolve to their imported values.
Just do a little bit of processing on the unbound identifiers:
#lang racket
(require (for
Now cam someone show me how to get Racket-style requiring in Python :-)
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 9:35 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> I think you want this:
>
> #lang racket/base
> (require (for-syntax racket/base
> syntax/parse
> racket/require-transform
>
I think you want this:
#lang racket/base
(require (for-syntax racket/base
syntax/parse
racket/require-transform
racket/syntax))
(define-syntax ns-in
(make-require-transformer
(λ (stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ mp:id)
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Shakna Israel wrote:
>
> I'm trying to introduce an implicit binding for require.
>
> One of the features I love about Python, is the namespace binding.
>
> import sys
>
> sys.stdout.write("Sweet")
>
> I know this can also be accomplished with require by specif
I'm trying to introduce an implicit binding for require.
One of the features I love about Python, is the namespace binding.
import sys
sys.stdout.write("Sweet")
I know this can also be accomplished with require by specifying a prefix-in, or
a prefix-out with a local-require.
However, I want a
13 matches
Mail list logo
