Re: [racket-users] Is it neccessary to learn how to define new language?

2016-09-19 Thread WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Lin Lee wrote: > I'm a newcomer to Racket,I have learned scheme before. > > Recently,I began to learn Racket,but I found that it's too complicate in > reader and expander. So,I want to know what if i dont learn this part.Does > it do harm to me? > > Any suggestion

[racket-users] note about info.rkt in package conflicts docs?

2016-09-19 Thread 'John Clements' via Racket Users
I’m separating a package into -lib and -test packages for the first time, and I’m wondering about the collection-level package files. Specifically, suppose that the packages foo-lib and foo-test both contribute files to the foo collection. Can each package contain its own foo/info.rkt file? Base

Re: [racket-users] Is it neccessary to learn how to define new language?

2016-09-19 Thread David Storrs
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Lin Lee wrote: > I'm a newcomer to Racket,I have learned scheme before. > > Recently,I began to learn Racket,but I found that it's too complicate in > reader and expander. So,I want to know what if i dont learn this part.Does > it do harm to me? > > Any suggestio

[racket-users] Is it neccessary to learn how to define new language?

2016-09-19 Thread Lin Lee
I'm a newcomer to Racket,I have learned scheme before. Recently,I began to learn Racket,but I found that it's too complicate in reader and expander. So,I want to know what if i dont learn this part.Does it do harm to me? Any suggestion is helpful. tks -- You received this message because you