On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:46 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
>
> First, nestable strings are nice for other things as well. For
> instance, since they don't escape backslashes, they are nice for
> constructing regexps, which famously explode into mountains of
> backslashes due to being inside "" stri
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 12:46 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
> Additionally, I've long wanted more types of parens in Racket. I
> haven't really known what I would do with them -- I use Racket's
> conventions for () and [], and have my own loose convention for {}. But
> after seeing Jay McCarthy's w
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:22:55 -0700, David Storrs
wrote:
>Aaaand, no sooner do I send this than I discover openssl/sha1. Sorry to
>have wasted your time.
>
>On a separate topic, is it reasonable to assume that openssl/sha1 will work
>on any platform that Racket will run on? I'm specifically thin
Le samedi 24 septembre 2016 18:46:07 UTC+2, William G Hatch a écrit :
> Udelim is a library for adding extra parens and string delimiters to
> your language.
I can't tell how ecstatic I am about this :) . I have been wanting to add new
parenthesis shapes for a while, but never found the time to l
Yes, the Racket distributions for Windows and Mac OS X include openssl,
so `openssl/sha1` will generally work.
At Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:22:55 -0700, David Storrs wrote:
> Aaaand, no sooner do I send this than I discover openssl/sha1. Sorry to
> have wasted your time.
>
> On a separate topic, is it
The Racket binding for Gtk (or Cocoa or Windows) in `racket/gui`
currently does not report multi-touch events. I agree that multi-touch
events could be supported without too much difficulty, probably, and a
pull request would be welcome --- but there's nothing in place right
now.
At Sat, 24 Sep 20
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:45:28 -0700 (PDT), Angus
wrote:
>I am reading through Realm of Racket and saw this function in the conditions
>chapter:
>
>(if (= (+ 1 2) 3)
> 'yup
> 'nope)
>
>So this function returns a symbol. Will be 'yup in above case. But 'yup
>confuses me. I don't really
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 7:09:28 PM UTC+2, Johan Liseborn wrote:
>
> I am currently working on a product where we are using Qt/C++, but the pain
> of C++ in this particular case is becoming unbearable to me, so I am looking
> for alternatives, and the available Qt language bindings see
Hi all,
Is it possible to detect and handle multi-touch events somehow in the Racket
GUI system? I have tried to look through the documentation, but can only find
mouse- and key events.
As far as I understand, the Racket GUI stuff is based on GTK+, which I believe
is able to handle multi-touch
Hello everybody,
I'm announcing another little package I've written to get comments on
it: udelim.
Udelim is a library for adding extra parens and string delimiters to
your language.
For many years, before ever coming to racket, I've wanted nestable
string delimiters. Especially when working
It’s mathematics and programming terminology:
(+ 1 1) is an expression, it computes something
When you write
(define (f x) (+ x 1))
then f is a function.
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Angus wrote:
>
> When you say it is an expression not a function, what do you mean? Are you
>
When you say it is an expression not a function, what do you mean? Are you
saying that if the symbols represented something then it would make sense? I
am a bit lost on your reply?
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 5:10:31 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> For the sheer pleasure of play
For the sheer pleasure of playing with symbols. (It is an expression not a
function.)
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Angus wrote:
>
> I am reading through Realm of Racket and saw this function in the conditions
> chapter:
>
> (if (= (+ 1 2) 3)
> 'yup
> 'nope)
>
> So this functi
I am reading through Realm of Racket and saw this function in the conditions
chapter:
(if (= (+ 1 2) 3)
'yup
'nope)
So this function returns a symbol. Will be 'yup in above case. But 'yup
confuses me. I don't really understand why you would want to return 'yup.
For example, I co
Aaaand, no sooner do I send this than I discover openssl/sha1. Sorry to
have wasted your time.
On a separate topic, is it reasonable to assume that openssl/sha1 will work
on any platform that Racket will run on? I'm specifically thinking of
Windows here.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 7:10 AM, David S
Is there a hashing function in Racket that will operate on a file without
reading the entire thing into memory first?
I need to verify that a file is unchanged after I break it into chunks and
then put the chunks back together again. My plan is to take a (sha, md5,
...) hash of the file before an
%raco pkg install collections
Resolving "collections" via
https://download.racket-lang.org/releases/6.6/catalog/
Resolving "collections" via https://pkgs.racket-lang.org
Downloading repository git://github.com/lexi-lambda/racket-collections
The following uninstalled packages are listed as dependen
17 matches
Mail list logo