[racket-users] Re: prepared queries

On 3/15/17 12:41 AM, George Neuner wrote: Hi Ryan, Hope you enjoyed the snow day. Lost power here for a while, but fortunately no damage. I did :) My neighborhood didn't get much snow by volume, but what it did get was then rained/sleeted nearly into ice. On 3/13/2017 11:09 PM, Ryan

[racket-users] Re: generate sentences

i have some progress on the markov machine that generate random sentences. i update here just in case. the program that consumes text and then calculate the probability of the next word, given the current word is a markov machine of memory 1. memory 1 means that we input it one word and it

Re: [racket-users] Re: minimal vs full racket performance issues

At Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack Firth wrote: > Side question for Racket package system folks: will the migration to Chez > scheme affect binary installs of packages? I seem to recall discussion that > bytecode might be going away as part of the Chez transition. I don't yet know

Re: [racket-users] minimal vs full racket performance issues

I can make a -lib version of jq for you. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-7, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> Just installing rackunit-lib will avoid the docs and tests, which should >> substantially