Re: [racket-users] Seeking expert opinion on how Racketeering tames web development chaos.

Eric MacAdie wrote on 08/01/2017 09:54 PM: WRT mobile, maybe someone could port LambdaNative to Racket: http://www.lambdanative.org/ Do you have experience with LambdaNative? I looked at it briefly a year or two ago, and it looked like they'd made reasonable and neat way to do what they

Re: [racket-users] How to store SQL query text outside Racket source code?

On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 8:45:25 PM UTC+8, david.vanderson wrote: > On 07/31/2017 10:46 PM, Alex Harsanyi wrote: > > Unfortunately, `define-runtime-path` can only be used at top-level, so the > > above code does not compile. It works fine without the > > `define-runtime-path', > > I need to

Re: [racket-users] Seeking expert opinion on how Racketeering tames web development chaos.

WRT mobile, maybe someone could port LambdaNative to Racket: http://www.lambdanative.org/ = Eric MacAdie On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Two things to add to my comments from early this morning... > > > * For servers, a nice

[racket-users] Re: Decision Tree in Racket - Performance

I think I've now implemented most of the optimizations mentioned in this topic. I also adapted my code to use some of the neat things I found in Daniel's code. The implementation now supports most of the optimization parameters for decision trees, which I found on:

Re: [racket-users] Printing Quickly

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:55:14PM -0700, Lehi Toskin wrote: On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 9:07:14 AM UTC-7, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: The Interaction Window in DrRacket supports snips, picts etc., so it is reasonable that is slower than a terminal. But ... maybe it is possible to let the user

Re: [racket-users] ~literal vs ~datum

2017-08-01 20:11 GMT+02:00 Jordan Johnson : > Hi all, > > Reading the documentation on ~datum in syntax/parse, I see: > > The ~datum form is useful for recognizing identifiers symbolically, in > contrast to the ~literal form, which recognizes them by binding. > That makes

[racket-users] ~literal vs ~datum

Hi all, Reading the documentation on ~datum in syntax/parse, I see: The ~datum form is useful for recognizing identifiers symbolically, in contrast to the ~literal form, which recognizes them by binding. That makes sense to me. But then I see: > (syntax-parse > > (let > > ([define

[racket-users] Re: How to store SQL query text outside Racket source code?

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:00:37 -0700 (PDT), Alex Harsanyi wrote: >On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:11:24 PM UTC+8, gneuner2 wrote: > >> Hmm.  A change to a query often also means a change to its arguments >> and/or its result columns, so I don't see that there is much

Re: [racket-users] How to store SQL query text outside Racket source code?

Building on Dave Vanderson's answer: Most of my files seem to have (define-runtime-path thisdir ".") at the top. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:45 AM, David Vanderson wrote: > On 07/31/2017 10:46 PM, Alex Harsanyi wrote: > >> Unfortunately, `define-runtime-path` can only

Re: [racket-users] How to store SQL query text outside Racket source code?

On 07/31/2017 10:46 PM, Alex Harsanyi wrote: Unfortunately, `define-runtime-path` can only be used at top-level, so the above code does not compile. It works fine without the `define-runtime-path', I need to use it so they query files are found when the application is compiled to a stand-alone

[racket-users] Re: Mono, racketscript, ffi, databases and pointer swizzling

On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 11:01:33 PM UTC+2, amz3 wrote: > By the way, do you recommend binding wiredtiger using typed racket? > > [3] they are other solution in racket. > [4] http://hyperdev.fr/projects/wiredtiger/ > > That said, I am not sure it can scale as much as I want/need given racket

Re: [racket-users] Re: Scheme and Javascript

Le 31/07/2017 16:21, Greg Trzeciak a écrit : > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:48:07 PM UTC+2, Hendrik Boom wrote: >> As I heard it, the people who made Javascript originally wanted to use >> Scheme, and were starting to set that up when management decided tht >> it had to look like C. They

[racket-users] Need help porting a library to Typed Racket

Hello guys, I have been porting my MessagePack library to Typed Racket over the last few days and I am almost done, except for some minor things I would like to sort out first, so I was hoping some experienced Racketeers could help me out. Here is the repo, the branch is "typed":