[racket-users] Re: Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

Maybe a LISP dialect on the Erlang BEAM would be interesting to you LFE . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [racket-users] Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

I just barely put up Goblins on the package repo this week. I haven't actually tested loading it on another machine, so I'm (literally) not sure what issues there are. :) The maintainer (me) is active, but it's pre-alpha. Arie van Wingerden writes: > Thx. Jens! > > Both packages appear to have

[racket-users] A mini Goblins tutorial (was: Is there an actor based library for Racket available?)

Arie van Wingerden writes: > Hi Christopher, > > 2018-05-11 15:31 GMT+02:00 Christopher Lemmer Webber >> >> In comparison to Syndicate, Goblins is less a new language and more a >> lightweight library for actors that interfaces nicely with "#lang >> racket" type code >>

Re: [racket-users] Please HELP ME! Programmers at scheme, i am calling you ! :D

Patrik, hello. On 11 May 2018, at 16:03, Patrik novak wrote: Ok then, i got problem with this. I wrote a procedure which i called 'make-mutable-selector', which make a mutable selector from quote symbol like 'mcaar, 'mcadr etc. But i don't know, how i can use this in the code, what i want

Re: [racket-users] Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

Hi Christopher, 2018-05-11 15:31 GMT+02:00 Christopher Lemmer Webber : > > In comparison to Syndicate, Goblins is less a new language and more a > lightweight library for actors that interfaces nicely with "#lang > racket" type code > ​.. > For me personally Goblin

Re: [racket-users] Please HELP ME! Programmers at scheme, i am calling you ! :D

Ok then, i got problem with this. I wrote a procedure which i called 'make-mutable-selector', which make a mutable selector from quote symbol like 'mcaar, 'mcadr etc. But i don't know, how i can use this in the code, what i want to write... i mean a macro with-mcxrs. (define-macro

Re: [racket-users] Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) writes: > Goblins is definitely under active development, as it was newly started. > > cwebber is active on the list. Goblins is new, but being actively developed indeed: https://gitlab.com/spritely/goblins In comparison to Syndicate, Goblins is less a new language and more

[racket-users] Re: Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

Thanks for all your answers! /aRIE -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: [racket-users] Is there an actor based library for Racket available?

Goblins is definitely under active development, as it was newly started. cwebber is active on the list. -- /c On Thu, May 10, 2018, 19:33 Arie van Wingerden wrote: > Thx. Jens! > > Both packages appear to have some issues. > Are their maintainers still active? > >