Is there any plan to translate current document of Racket to other language.
If true ,how could the translator contribute to the document
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Jay:
Thanks for taking the time to educate me a bit. I expect you are right
regarding some/most of my concerns being due to misunderstandings on my
part. Despite playing with Racket for a few years, it wasn't until this
particular project (with a deadline) that I really began to dig in more
Hi Brian,
I think you are misunderstanding what that section is about. It is
just describing how the system is implemented. There's basically
nothing in there that you need to know as user other than "It may take
a while to compile." For instance, you don't worry about the fact that
all
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 12:10:18 AM UTC+8, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> What do people think about the following way of providing Scribble API
> documentation from a module?
>
>
Scribble can already be used to document Racket packages and the `scrdoc`
modules can be used by people who
Hello all,
This is a conversation I had with Jay earlier earlier this month. I
asked if I could forward it and Jay said that's fine, so I'm doing so in
case it's of use to anyone else.
For those not in the know, Jay's DOS package stands for
"Delimited-continuation-based Operating-system
I could be misreading the information in "3.2 Usage Considerations", but it
seemed like the modifications to my program were automatic, but maybe that
only happens when using #lang web-server or #lang web-server/base ?
Regardless, I'm wondering if maybe I should just use (serve) instead of
There's nothing wrong with ignoring the continuation support in the
Web server, either the native ones or stateless ones. If you do, I
recommend using something like `create-none-manager` [1] as the
`#:manager` argument to `serve/servlet` so that you don't accidentally
start using them. The "too
Greg Hendershott wrote on 11/30/18 12:01 PM:
Are you familiar with the existing `srcdoc` submodule?
https://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/srcdoc.html
If so: I'm curious, what are your thoughts behind not using it?
For one reason, when I asked in January whether `srcdoc` is something to
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 08:23, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why `-e` doesn't evaluate in the same namespace as the
> REPL, but if you put `(enter! "my-file.rkt")` in `enter.rktl` then:
I’m curious about this, too. At first I thought it was just a misfeature, not
necessarily a bug,
Awesome - thanks! I wonder if using serve, instead of serve/servlet, may
also avoid the extra functionality described in "Stateless Servlets" that I
mentioned in another thread here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/racket-users/fc0mRI-empE
On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:57:00 PM
A while ago, I read Jay's response about how to use the Racket web server
w/o continuations here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/racket-users/bTBj-RbMLDA/k80HNazuFAAJ
At the time, I didn't dig very deeply into it and just assumed avoiding
web-server/servlet would be sufficient, but I
Brian Adkins writes:
> I just did a quick test, and "kill " will stop the Racket web server,
> but not gracefully. In other words, it doesn't allow the current request to
> finish. Maybe another signal will gracefully stop it?
I personally run the server with serve[1] which runs it in a
I just did a quick test, and "kill " will stop the Racket web server,
but not gracefully. In other words, it doesn't allow the current request to
finish. Maybe another signal will gracefully stop it?
On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:36:04 PM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote:
>
> The Unicorn app
The Unicorn app server uses signals to perform a graceful restart of the
worker processes. For example: "kill -USR2 ". This seems like a
reasonable approach, so my first though was to use something similar for my
Racket app server processes.
I found Tony's unix-signals package, but the
Are you familiar with the existing `srcdoc` submodule?
https://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/srcdoc.html
If so: I'm curious, what are your thoughts behind not using it?
If not: The existing `scribble/srcdoc` interface works, but I think
there's definitely an opportunity to build some
You can report an issue at https://github.com/racket/racket/issues
Sam
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:56 AM Habib Alamin wrote:
>
> Great points which I’d overlooked. It solved the immediate problem; thanks
> for this improved approach.
>
> I’ll be implementing that soon (hoping it works). I just
Great points which I’d overlooked. It solved the immediate problem; thanks for
this improved approach.
I’ll be implementing that soon (hoping it works). I just gotta decide where to
place the enter file for maximum reusability.
Does anyone know where I could report this misfeature, by the way?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:58 AM Robby Findler
wrote:
> What about using the function
>
> (lambda (x) (and x #true))
>
> And putting a short discussion of truthy and a link to elsewhere in the docs?
Yeah. I feel like the `filter-map` doc would be fine with just that change.
Already it tells you
I strongly recommend not doing this. In particular, it will break in
many situations. A few examples:
- any file that isn't written in #lang racket such as typed/racket or
scribble/manual or ...
- any file that doesn't work the same as a sequence of repl
interactions. For example, any use of
Thanks for the help, but I've already solved the problem; not sure if my second
message went out.
I was looking for a very specific workflow, and I have it working now, so I no
longer require any help (but am open to any criticisms of the workflow I have
chosen).
Cheers,
Habib
> On 30 Nov
If you have xrepl enabled (it is by default in recent Rackets), you
get a bunch of handy commands. Try entering ,help to see them. One is
,enter.
So one common workflow is you keep one `racket` process running all
the time, and simply type `,en /path/to/to/file.rkt` at the prompt.
If typing `,en
I've found monit to work alongside systemd services pretty neatly. As in, I
have monit monitoring my web server, which is running using systemd, and
monit sends me emails if it's not working or something.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket
What about using the function
(lambda (x) (and x #true))
And putting a short discussion of truthy and a link to elsewhere in the
docs?
Robby
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:17 PM Philip McGrath
wrote:
> I can do it.
>
> -Philip
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:17 PM John Clements
> wrote:
>
>> I
I found a solution:
nnoremap r :w \| !racket -e "$(grep -v '\#lang' %)" -i
This little hack, instead of enter!ing a file, simply echoes the contents
of the file into the -e argument using a subshell. Racket treats newlines
the same as spaces, and ignores blank lines, but if you're a neat
24 matches
Mail list logo
