On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:04 AM infodeveloperdon
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It has been awhile since I've been posting questions to [Racket Users].
> Previously, my gmail account would receive both my query entry and every
> reply entry. (Of course, it actually received all entries and replies entered
>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 15:04 -0800, infodeveloperdon wrote:
> Can anyone advise how I might begin to configure somewhere so that I
> receive all reply entries in addition to the top-level entries that I
> currently receive in my gmail account?
I have this list set up on my own personal mail
Hi Sorawee,
This is a blight on an otherwise brilliant tutorial. Sadly I don't have
the time to resolve it.
Lacking a clear solution I've added an issue
https://github.com/racket/web-server/issues/50
A short term solution much be to drop @defthing[] and use a monospace font,
maybe using @tt[]?
Hi,
It has been awhile since I've been posting questions to [Racket Users].
Previously, my gmail account would receive both my query entry and every
reply entry. (Of course, it actually received all entries and replies
entered into [Racket Users].)
When I began using [Racket Users] recently, I
Well, that sounds pretty fantastic. Looks like it’s time to take another look
at Rash!
John
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 1:40 PM, William G Hatch wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:11:39PM -0500, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>> Does rash have autocompletion of paths, yet? That’s my
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:11:39PM -0500, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
Does rash have autocompletion of paths, yet? That’s my one super-super wishlist
item.
It has some basic path autocompletion -- if you type `ls /e` and hit
tab it will complete to `ls /etc/`, and you can hit tab
Does rash have autocompletion of paths, yet? That’s my one super-super wishlist
item.
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 6:17 AM, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> I am surprised nobody mentioned Rash. I have been using it for all my
> shell scripting needs and it's awesome.
>
>
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 16:30 +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can can anyone point me to any package or other Racket code that uses the
> Racket OpenCV package ?
>
> https://github.com/oetr/racket-opencv
There is the "tutorials" directory in that repository (but this might be
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 8:34:35 PM PST Hassan Shahin wrote:
> I have this definition for a procedure:
>
> (define type-of (lambda (item)
> (cond
>[(pair? item) 'pair]
>[(null? item) 'empty-list]
>
Oh, neat. Thank you.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:18 AM 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
> I am surprised nobody mentioned Rash. I have been using it for all my
> shell scripting needs and it's awesome.
>
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/rash
>
> On 29/12/2018 05:09, David Storrs
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:04 AM Sorawee Porncharoenwase
wrote:
>
> Yup. This is exactly the proposal I made above, but you stated it far more
> clear :)
Whoops. Insufficient coffee. Sorry!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
Also note that that there's something called "tail recursion modulo cons"
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail_call#Tail_recursion_modulo_cons),
though as I understand, Racket didn't implement it.
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:29:28 AM UTC-8, Sorawee Porncharoenwase
wrote:
>
> Yes, Racket
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 10:13 AM, Will Jukes wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was helping a student the other day with a problem where they were to write
> a recursive function that uses trial division to return a list of the prime
> factors of an integer (no fancy optimizations, these are high
Yes, Racket recognizes the distinction and "optimize" those calls that can
be optimized. Though people might not be happy with the word "optimize". To
quote Shriram:
It is not an "optimization". An optimization is an optional
> thing; you can't rely on it being done. When you program
Hi everyone,
I was helping a student the other day with a problem where they were to
write a recursive function that uses trial division to return a list of the
prime factors of an integer (no fancy optimizations, these are high school
kids who don't have a lot of number theory). It looked
I feel like every traditional term is subject to "how many angels can
dance on the tip of a parenthesis?" debates.
For example I prefer "function" but if we rename procedure-arity to
function-arity there will be people who complain that 1 is the only
correct value. :)
There are terms like
Yup. This is exactly the proposal I made above, but you stated it far more
clear :)
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 6:50:41 AM UTC-8, Greg Hendershott wrote:
>
> It seems to me that each of those `defthing`s has reasonably good text.
>
> The problem is that the text is in the preceding
It seems to me that each of those `defthing`s has reasonably good text.
The problem is that the text is in the preceding paragraph, instead of
inside `defthing`.
The motivation is it's in "user's guide" style not "reference" style.
But I'd argue these `defthing` forms belong in reference docs
I am surprised nobody mentioned Rash. I have been using it for all my
shell scripting needs and it's awesome.
https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/rash
On 29/12/2018 05:09, David Storrs wrote:
> I am using 'system' to offload some work onto wget and other
> applications in a few one-off scripts.
19 matches
Mail list logo
