Re: [racket-users] Editor task: finding end of code on line

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jordan Johnson wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, Robby. > > On Jul 2, 2019, at 19:11, Robby Findler wrote: > One note not related to what you ask: lines in editor<%> parlance are > soft-breaking; the methods about paragraphs are the ones you want. > For which

Re: [racket-users] Editor task: finding end of code on line

Thanks for the reply, Robby. On Jul 2, 2019, at 19:11, Robby Findler wrote: > One note not related to what you ask: lines in editor<%> parlance are > soft-breaking; the methods about paragraphs are the ones you want. For which specific purpose? The method that c:e is bound to by default

Re: [racket-users] can Typed Racket handle this function type safely?

No, for two reasons. One, currently `require/typed` does not support function types with two cases that have the same number of arguments. Second, Typed Racket's subtyping treats that type as a subtype of `(All (a) (-> a a))`, so your program gives "interesting" results if we add this line at the

[racket-users] can Typed Racket handle this function type safely?

In the code below, can `maybe-car` have the given type without using typed/racket/unsafe? #lang typed/racket (require typed/racket/unsafe) (module untyped racket (provide maybe-car) (define (maybe-car x) (cond [(pair? x) (car x)] [else x]))) (unsafe-require/typed 'untyped

Re: [racket-users] raise-argument-error missing list?

> On Jul 5, 2019, at 10:51 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > DrRacket hides the other arguments to make the error message initially > more compact. Click "..." in DrRacket to expose the arguments. > Thanks! The explanation has suddenly made it “intuitive” to me :) Kevin -- You received this

Re: [racket-users] raise-argument-error missing list?

DrRacket hides the other arguments to make the error message initially more compact. Click "..." in DrRacket to expose the arguments. At Fri, 5 Jul 2019 10:49:09 -0700, Kevin Forchione wrote: > Hi guys, > Been adding raise-argument-error to my functions to catch errors and have > noticed that

[racket-users] raise-argument-error missing list?

Hi guys, Been adding raise-argument-error to my functions to catch errors and have noticed that the 2nd version of the form doesn’t actually list the other arguments - even for the example in the docs: >(define (feed-animals cow sheep goose cat) (if (not (eq? goose 'goose))

[racket-users] Re: [PSA] Upcoming projects

Hi Eric, The DAW library project sounds interesting. I don't know much about music production, but a friend has been getting into it, so I've dabbled a bit. It's always cool to see what people can do with code and music. The other day I watched some of Chris Ford's talks, and that was neat.