Cool, thanks!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 4:11 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:26:17 -0500, David Storrs wrote:
> > My understanding is that parameters are copied between threads, but I'm
> not
> > sure how this interacts with things like file ports, network connections,
> > etc. Would
First, one thing I would suggest is that you can create pull requests
for anything right from the GitHub UI, although that doesn't let you
test them. Especially for small documentation changes where there's no
chance you're breaking something, I find that to be very effective and
lightweight.
Seco
It feels like much of the information needed to make some of the sign posts
for easy contribution are available either 1) automatically available at
time of documentation build, or 2) could be added to the info file.
Would someone in the Racket team be able to recommend or suggest some
concrete wa
I think your point is totally valid, and I feel that I already saw such
discussion in the mail list.
You can simplify the process by searching a piece of the documentation in
github. For example, I search for a piece of the docs from rackjure (1)
which is the second result in my search.
(1)
htt
What if we had a `(vector-index/c vec)` contract combinator? It would be
equivalent to `(integer-in 0 (sub1 (vector-length vec)))`.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2019 at 1:29:22 PM UTC-8, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:24:10 +0100, Dominik Pantůček wrote:
> > What about all the vecto
FWIW I just found an introduction to Racket GUIs by Andres Ramos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo6wVXS6dkU
/soegaard
Den tir. 19. nov. 2019 kl. 18.49 skrev pow bam :
> Hello, I am very new to programming and up until this point I had only
> seriously messed with the AutoIt language - it was
At Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:26:17 -0500, David Storrs wrote:
> My understanding is that parameters are copied between threads, but I'm not
> sure how this interacts with things like file ports, network connections,
> etc. Would the following code be problematic?
>
>
> (define conn (make-parameter))
>
For the record, my big concern with the documentation is that it's
extremely hard to contribute to. I would be delighted to contribute
documentation if the process was easy, but it's just not. For a language
as amazing as Racket and a documentation set as high-quality as Racket's,
the difficulty
My understanding is that parameters are copied between threads, but I'm not
sure how this interacts with things like file ports, network connections,
etc. Would the following code be problematic?
(define conn (make-parameter))
(define s (udp-open-socket))
(udp-bind! s #f 12345)
(conn s)
(threa
While playing around with this I came across an error message in match that
could perhaps stand some improvement ...
> (define (super-cool?/flawed ds)
(match ds
[(list _ ... a a ... _) #t]
[_ #f]))
a59: unbound identifier;
also, no #%top syntax transformer is bound in: a59
Dan
-
The usual way I've done this is with some custom CSS to set the
navigation to "display: none".
Sam
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 5:12 PM 'Reuben Thomas' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
> How can I get scribble/base to output HTML without the navigation elements? I
> just want a plain HTML page, similar to t
11 matches
Mail list logo
