Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:33 PM Hendrik Boom wrote: Sounds like there was more than one microEmacs. Interesting. > Sorry, I was actually talking about Freemacs, but I had forgotten its name. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org We do, doodley do, doodley do, doodley do, What we must, muddily must, muddily must, muddily must; Muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, Until we bust, bodily bust, bodily bust, bodily bust. --Bokonon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAD2gp_SuQgy%3Dz%2BaXKVjuL_x1cihAD0AM2FRL3N-8%2B5%3DoQu27Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:24:19PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language
> based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl
> at . But there were a lot of other
> differences unrelated to Elisp vs. MINT.
Sounds like there was more than one microEmacs. Interesting.
-- hendrik
>
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:56 PM Hendrik Boom
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> > > Hi james
> > >
> > > * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another
> > > GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of
> > these
> > > over another?*
> > >
> > > Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the
> > > survey response)
> >
> > No idea. I haven't even heard of those.
> >
> > I use emacs for everything except Racket.
> >
> > In my life, I've used emacs, zemacs, and microemacs.
> >
> > Of these three, microemaacs was the only independent implementation,
> > based on an language that wasn't a Lisp derivative. (I think a
> > byte-coded or threaded-coded stack language, but that was a long
> > time ago.
> >
> > -- hendrik
> >
> > >
> > > S.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:20, James Platt wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use
> > two
> > > > or even three editors.
> > > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/
> > > >
> > > > I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of
> > those
> > > > two, myself. That was after you had posted your Venn diagram. I was
> > > > mostly using DrRacket before but now I am mostly using Emacs. I still
> > like
> > > > the features in DrRacket for tracing definitions and use it for that.
> > > > Also, I have two monitors and Gnu Emacs in the terminal does fine for
> > > > splitting the screen on one monitor but not so well across two
> > monitors.
> > > > So, on the occasions where I want another file open on my second
> > monitor, I
> > > > have been using Emacs on the main monitor but DrRacket on the second.
> > I
> > > > probably could use Emacs on multiple monitors if I used one of the Mac
> > > > specific GUI versions. I noticed several people at Racketcon using,
> > not
> > > > Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular
> > reason
> > > > to pick one of these over another?
> > > >
> > > > I also have set up a Racket development environment in Termux on my
> > > > Android tablet. Since there is no version of DrRacket for Android, I
> > am
> > > > exclusively using Emacs there. Having said that, I haven't actually
> > done
> > > > any more yet than test it to see that it works.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Racket Users" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an
> > > > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > > >
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/46BF6E5F-A613-4FF5-9C9B-C1526B31B54A%40biomantica.com
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Racket Users" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAGHj7-J35yMXr7jWi-1ifQ5tDh0r6ibfv6UUUMZtZrR%2Bugf3Jw%40mail.gmail.com
> > .
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Racket Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200229175601.6tm6chr4c5o2tclh%40topoi.pooq.com
> > .
> >
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200301043343.aanza6j6p4urcqs6%40topoi.pooq.com.
Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey
MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language
based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl
at . But there were a lot of other
differences unrelated to Elisp vs. MINT.
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:56 PM Hendrik Boom
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> > Hi james
> >
> > * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another
> > GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of
> these
> > over another?*
> >
> > Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the
> > survey response)
>
> No idea. I haven't even heard of those.
>
> I use emacs for everything except Racket.
>
> In my life, I've used emacs, zemacs, and microemacs.
>
> Of these three, microemaacs was the only independent implementation,
> based on an language that wasn't a Lisp derivative. (I think a
> byte-coded or threaded-coded stack language, but that was a long
> time ago.
>
> -- hendrik
>
> >
> > S.
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:20, James Platt wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use
> two
> > > or even three editors.
> > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/
> > >
> > > I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of
> those
> > > two, myself. That was after you had posted your Venn diagram. I was
> > > mostly using DrRacket before but now I am mostly using Emacs. I still
> like
> > > the features in DrRacket for tracing definitions and use it for that.
> > > Also, I have two monitors and Gnu Emacs in the terminal does fine for
> > > splitting the screen on one monitor but not so well across two
> monitors.
> > > So, on the occasions where I want another file open on my second
> monitor, I
> > > have been using Emacs on the main monitor but DrRacket on the second.
> I
> > > probably could use Emacs on multiple monitors if I used one of the Mac
> > > specific GUI versions. I noticed several people at Racketcon using,
> not
> > > Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular
> reason
> > > to pick one of these over another?
> > >
> > > I also have set up a Racket development environment in Termux on my
> > > Android tablet. Since there is no version of DrRacket for Android, I
> am
> > > exclusively using Emacs there. Having said that, I haven't actually
> done
> > > any more yet than test it to see that it works.
> > >
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Racket Users" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/46BF6E5F-A613-4FF5-9C9B-C1526B31B54A%40biomantica.com
> > > .
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Racket Users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAGHj7-J35yMXr7jWi-1ifQ5tDh0r6ibfv6UUUMZtZrR%2Bugf3Jw%40mail.gmail.com
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200229175601.6tm6chr4c5o2tclh%40topoi.pooq.com
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAD2gp_QZroCJJGTaN7y0VmCyr2iEHGyrXz7kiApEFmEUaUNzHg%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > Hi james > > * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another > GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these > over another?* > > Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the > survey response) No idea. I haven't even heard of those. I use emacs for everything except Racket. In my life, I've used emacs, zemacs, and microemacs. Of these three, microemaacs was the only independent implementation, based on an language that wasn't a Lisp derivative. (I think a byte-coded or threaded-coded stack language, but that was a long time ago. -- hendrik > > S. > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:20, James Platt wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > > > > At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two > > or even three editors. > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ > > > > I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of those > > two, myself. That was after you had posted your Venn diagram. I was > > mostly using DrRacket before but now I am mostly using Emacs. I still like > > the features in DrRacket for tracing definitions and use it for that. > > Also, I have two monitors and Gnu Emacs in the terminal does fine for > > splitting the screen on one monitor but not so well across two monitors. > > So, on the occasions where I want another file open on my second monitor, I > > have been using Emacs on the main monitor but DrRacket on the second. I > > probably could use Emacs on multiple monitors if I used one of the Mac > > specific GUI versions. I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not > > Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason > > to pick one of these over another? > > > > I also have set up a Racket development environment in Termux on my > > Android tablet. Since there is no version of DrRacket for Android, I am > > exclusively using Emacs there. Having said that, I haven't actually done > > any more yet than test it to see that it works. > > > > > > James > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/46BF6E5F-A613-4FF5-9C9B-C1526B31B54A%40biomantica.com > > . > > > -- > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAGHj7-J35yMXr7jWi-1ifQ5tDh0r6ibfv6UUUMZtZrR%2Bugf3Jw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200229175601.6tm6chr4c5o2tclh%40topoi.pooq.com.
Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey
Hi james * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these over another?* Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the survey response) S. On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:20, James Platt wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > > At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two > or even three editors. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ > > I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of those > two, myself. That was after you had posted your Venn diagram. I was > mostly using DrRacket before but now I am mostly using Emacs. I still like > the features in DrRacket for tracing definitions and use it for that. > Also, I have two monitors and Gnu Emacs in the terminal does fine for > splitting the screen on one monitor but not so well across two monitors. > So, on the occasions where I want another file open on my second monitor, I > have been using Emacs on the main monitor but DrRacket on the second. I > probably could use Emacs on multiple monitors if I used one of the Mac > specific GUI versions. I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not > Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason > to pick one of these over another? > > I also have set up a Racket development environment in Termux on my > Android tablet. Since there is no version of DrRacket for Android, I am > exclusively using Emacs there. Having said that, I haven't actually done > any more yet than test it to see that it works. > > > James > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/46BF6E5F-A613-4FF5-9C9B-C1526B31B54A%40biomantica.com > . > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAGHj7-J35yMXr7jWi-1ifQ5tDh0r6ibfv6UUUMZtZrR%2Bugf3Jw%40mail.gmail.com.
[racket-users] How to Create a Pollen Markup Alternative in 61 Lines
This is a fun workshop-style post as per the subject line. https://sagegerard.com/making-powerful-racket-markup.html It took a while to figure out how to mix #langs without hitting the filesystem, let alone distill it to a post. If convenient, please play with this for a bit and see if you find any bugs or limitations? ~slg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/skgBH2Ih1T7BPO4XcIlq-waMilQNs8pFqgaf2FHlR_fvrDpCMZBi65KeMsyvh-HcAZQtmZ7LuBS23EQySESw1H4NW0giab3UKSjIXQhXVj0%3D%40sagegerard.com.
