On 3/5/20, hashim muqtadir wrote:
> So I have this file, found here:
> https://gitlab.com/hashimmm/remap/-/blob/3682db9fff3bc5007833e07bf9a9ed6e8e0170a9/private/tables.rkt
>
> Lines 51 through 55 say:
>
> (define-type (Func<%> A) (BaseFunc<%> A FuncAnyParam))(define-type
> BoolFunc<%> (Func<%>
IIUC every `font%` object must correspond to a particular font file on disk.
If so, given a `font%` object, how do I extract the path to that file?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 3/21/20, Aron Zvi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can I get a hint for Exercise 342 find-all
>
Don't use `find` as a helper function; instead, design a function that
returns a list of successes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
On 3/30/20, Aron Zvi wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> In 22.3 Domain-Specific Languages: Configurations, the book introduces the
> following data example and data definitions for FSM configurations
>
>
> (define
>
Thanks Wesley and Matthias! Very helpful advice.
March 31, 2020 2:40 AM, "Wesley Bitomski" mailto:wesley.bitom...@gmail.com?to=%22Wesley%20Bitomski%22%20)>
wrote:
Hello Ed,
I generally get some mileage out of using custom predicates (those that are
made with define-predicate) and pattern
I have done some further digging. Looks like it is non-trivial to remove
the top-level-bind-scope and still preserve the current behaviors of
top-level `define-values` and `define-syntaxes`. In particular, through
`as-expand-time-top-level-bindings` in "expander/expand/bind-top.rkt", both
6 matches
Mail list logo
