On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:31 PM John Clements
wrote:
> What if he has directories that aren’t part of an installed package? That
> was my concern, and why I suggested manually deleting compiled subdirs.
>
That's right, but given:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:16 PM Don Green
wrote:
> Welcome to
What if he has directories that aren’t part of an installed package? That was
my concern, and why I suggested manually deleting compiled subdirs.
John
> On Apr 13, 2021, at 18:58, Philip McGrath wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:21 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
> It sounds
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:21 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> It sounds to me like the solution might be much much simpler than
> re-installing an earlier version of racket. Here’s what I recommend.
>
> 1) Delete all of the “compiled” subdirectories in
Thanks for clarifying!
It sounds to me like the solution might be much much simpler than re-installing
an earlier version of racket. Here’s what I recommend.
1) Delete all of the “compiled” subdirectories in your development path.
2) run “raco setup”.
It seems likely to me that this will solve
I have several versions of racket installed on Ubuntu linux at default
linux locations.
I think I should uninstall them all.
Then after downloading a PPA from the racket web site
install the version I want to a single directory. (I would be downloading
version: 7.8)
Does this sound like a plan so
apt get upgrade
Since Racket was installed on my system, apt get upgrade goes out and finds
the latest version of Racket and installs it. version 8.
I was having no problems with Racket.
In the future I'll use PPA to install new Racket versions when I want them
- and all to a single directory.
C
Did you install racket using a package manager, perhaps from the racket PPA?
(I’m guessing the answer is yes, since this seems like the most likely
situation to have caused an unintentional upgrade.)
If so, I think you should generally get the right behavior from using that same
package manager
How to make a previously installed version of Racket current?
My O.S. is linux Ubuntu.
Is it a matter of running:
raco pkg install ...
again.
Thanks
Don.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rec
Hmm… that’s a new one to me. It sounds like there’s a setting that can be
toggled, I’m not quite sure what the ramifications of toggling that setting
would be.
John
> On Apr 13, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Don Green wrote:
>
> "You do not have permission to respond to author in this group."
> upon clic
"You do not have permission to respond to author in this group."
upon clicking button [Respond To Author]
in Google Groups/ Racket
Is there a setting I can change or is just the way this group is configured
for all?
Thanks
Don
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi, I'm using linux Ubuntu.
Don
On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 1:02:33 PM UTC-6 johnbclements wrote:
> raco pkg remove is definitely not what you want.
>
> In general, I know there are languages (ocaml, haskell, rust) that put
> their package managers “outside” of the currently installed version,
Right -- looks like I was barking up the wrong herring.
Robby
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:00 PM Bruce O'Neel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that the label foreground and background colours are ok.
>
> #lang racket
> (require racket/gui/base)
> (define bg (get-label-background-color))
> (define fg (get
raco pkg remove is definitely not what you want.
In general, I know there are languages (ocaml, haskell, rust) that put their
package managers “outside” of the currently installed version, so it might make
sense that a package manager command could be used to change to an earlier
version of the
Hi,
I think that the label foreground and background colours are ok.
#lang racket
(require racket/gui/base)
(define bg (get-label-background-color))
(define fg (get-label-foreground-color))
Produces
> (send bg red)
255
> (send bg green)
255
> (send bg blue)
2
My guess (will investigate) is that I broke things with this commit:
https://github.com/racket/draw/commit/a6558bdc18438e784c23d452ffd877dac867a7fd
At Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:41:45 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> This looks to me like racket believes the OS is in dark mode but it really
> isn't. Does
Thanks. Since I do this often at night I thought the same at first. I get the
same during daytime.
The program produces #f
cheers
bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
And I should have added that that function's result is based on a luminance
computation of this function:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/Windowing_Functions.html?q=get-label-background#%28def._%28%28lib._mred%2Fmain..rkt%29._get-label-background-color%29%29
and the foreground one. So if there i
This looks to me like racket believes the OS is in dark mode but it really
isn't. Does this program produce true or false?
#lang racket
(require mrlib/panel-wob)
(white-on-black-panel-scheme?)
Robby
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:38 PM Bruce O'Neel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The most recent snapshot version
Hi,
The most recent snapshot version built on Linux x86-64, Arm32, and Arm64 all
have funny black blocks in the UI of Dr Racket.
While this display was captured from a MacOS X11 server it is the same on the
Linux X11 servers as well as directly on the console screen.
Thanks.
I inadvertently upgraded Racket version. Would like to make an older
installed version current.
So now when I start DrRacket v8 is current.
Is there a command that makes a specified version current?
Does
raco pkg remove
effectively make the previous version current?
Thanks. Don.
--
You receive
20 matches
Mail list logo