At Fri, 18 Jun 2021 05:29:14 -0400, George Neuner wrote:
> My point was that the docs for write-bytes-avail et al specifically
> mention "flush" of data, and in a way that implies (to me) that there is
> expected to be something else underlying the buffer to "flush" to, e.g.,
> storage media,
Short answer: Yes...ish. I wrote a few code generation programs.
It can happen, but the Racket program would be dependent on the target
language's toolchain and standard library. Before we get to that, note that not
all languages cleanly translate into one another (Some scripting languages
No idea if this is what you're looking for, but I have a feeling it
wouldn't be terribly difficult to design a #lang where modules were
programs that, when run, output C# code (kind of like how scribble & pollen
can output HTML). Then you could have a language (w/ or w/o) macros that
gets run
Thank you, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, for expressing this.
I am an "ordinary" Racket user - I don't hack on Racket itself, I don't
even create DSLs (yet). But I care about Racket a lot, I tell people about
it, I write software in it, and I even contributed a small feature to a
racket package.
I was
4 matches
Mail list logo
