Hi Matthew
Thanks for the fast reply! Well I have to apologize - I had skipped the
"dist" step. For some reason I assumed incorrectly the dist was if you
were building for another OS vs hardware architecture. I ran your test as
well and it worked perfectly. Thanks again!
Mike
On Fri, Oct
At Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:24:30 -0400, Mike Engelhart wrote:
> I wanted to build a binary to send to a colleague to test it (who
> isn't a programmer and doesn't have Racket installed) but when I
> build it on my intel Macbook Pro and then send it to my M1 iMac
That should work.
I tried this small e
Hi all
I'm new to Racket so this may be explained somewhere although searching the
web I couldn't find anything related to this.
I'm working on my first real project in Racket and it leverages http-easy
to do some simple API calls and processes the responses. I wanted to
build a binary to send
Thank you!
Is it possible to safely load untrusted module with dynamic-require?
пятница, 22 октября 2021 г. в 22:59:57 UTC+5, Robby Findler:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:43 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
>> At Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT), "kalime...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> > I've read about
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:43 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT), "kalime...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > I've read about protect-out and current-code-inspector, but I still
> cannot
> > understand, how to require a module and forbid it to run protected
> modules.
> >
>
At Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT), "kalime...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I've read about protect-out and current-code-inspector, but I still cannot
> understand, how to require a module and forbid it to run protected modules.
>
> Something like (require untrusted-foo) (foo-proc) but to forbid fo
I'd be interested to know this as well. It sounds like something that
isn't possible in Racket, since it's essentially specifying how a module
can do its job and that requires a level of introspection that I think is
excluded by design.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:37 AM kalime...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 5:26 AM George Neuner wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2021 5:53 PM, unlimitedscolobb wrote:
>
>
>
You can get a lot of mileage out of the 'set' datatype, which removes
ordering from the equation, especially since lists will act as sets in a
pinch. (When you want to improve performanc
Here's a schedule for event, with abstracts and speakers:
https://con.racket-lang.org/
Get hyped!
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy
Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
http://jeapostrophe.github.io
Vincit qui se vincit.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> In November 2021, on the wee
9 matches
Mail list logo