Re: [racket-users] IO in racket is painful

2017-07-21 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
with data. Being fluent with this kind of programing gives people the confidence they need to solve smaller problems or explore potential solutions to large problems in an unstructured manner before tackling the methodical, "right" solution. -- Brian Mastenbrook b

Re: [racket-users] RacketCon Code of Conduct

2017-06-19 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
of conference that doesn't need to have a code but has one anyway. Isn't that better than the alternative? -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@mastenbrook.net https://brian.mastenbrook.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To u

Re: [racket-users] Macro-generating macros

2015-09-03 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
tax-parameterize ([send (λ (stx) (syntax-parse stx [(send obj:expr method:id x:expr (... ...)) #'(method obj x (... ...))]))]) body ...))])) (def (foo2 x y) (send x + y)) (foo2 2 3) --

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-20 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: Racket version 6.2 is now available from http://racket-lang.org/ Congratulations and many thanks to the maintainers on the release! Is there anything I can do to help get the Racket distributions for Windows and OS

Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

2015-06-20 Thread Brian Mastenbrook
Is there anything I can do to help get the Racket distributions for Windows and OS X code signed so they can be run without scary warning dialogs in the default OS configuration? I'm more than willing to sponsor the cost of any necessary certificates or developer programs. Failing that, has