Re: [racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-21 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
the name and the `nt` pattern matching construct matches > only non-terminals without binding a name. > > Thanks for finding the bug! > > Robby > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 2:50 PM Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa wrote: > >> Just to clarify, I understan

Re: [racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-21 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
know, I would have expected for the application of the constraint of names, that would have rendered #f the match. thanks!, Mallku El martes, 21 de diciembre de 2021 a las 17:38:28 UTC-3, Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa escribió: > Hi to everyone!, > I'm trying to test the mechani

Re: [racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-21 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
anyone understand the behavior of the shown example under racket 8.3? Thanks in advance!, Mallku [1] : https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-25318-8_27 El jueves, 9 de diciembre de 2021 a las 13:20:31 UTC-3, Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa escribió: > Thanks a lot for the info! I

Re: [racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-09 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
match; the underlying > algorithms have not changed, only bug fixes have happened. > > Of course, if you find that this isn't the case, I'd be very interested to > hear more :) > > Robby > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 6:34 PM Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa < >

Re: [racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-08 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
Findler escribió: > I think that might be it specifically about redex, I am sorry to say. > > Robby > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 5:28 PM Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa < > mallku...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi community!, >> I'm interested in understandi

[racket-users] Formal semantics of PLT Redex

2021-12-08 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
Hi community!, I'm interested in understanding the semantics of PLT Redex, since we are working on a tool to translate fragments of Redex models to Coq. At the moment, we just have a mechanization in Coq of the semantics proposed in a ~10 years old paper [1]. Does anybody know if there is an

Re: [racket-users] Typesetting Redex definitions

2021-10-26 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
> tools -- one nice thing to do is to use scribble (which generates latex) as > it has handling to make them look nice in the rendered output, although > getting the right fonts set up can sometimes be tricky). > > hth, > Robby > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 1:55 PM Ma

[racket-users] Typesetting Redex definitions

2021-10-26 Thread Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa
Hi community!, a colleague of mine is trying to typeset a grammar from a model in Redex, using redex/pict. So far, he has obtained a nice-looking typesetting of the productions, but with the inconvenience that they are not abstract. In particular, there are parentheses around every list of