Re: [racket-users] Racket's UDP Behavior

2016-04-12 Thread Nick Gordon
On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 1:41:57 PM UTC-5, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: > On 04/11/2016 01:52 PM, Nick Gordon wrote: > > I'm building reliable data transfer onto Racket's UDP suite for a > > term project, and I need to know what Racket does with corrupt > > datagrams. Since

[racket-users] Racket's UDP Behavior

2016-04-11 Thread Nick Gordon
I'm building reliable data transfer onto Racket's UDP suite for a term project, and I need to know what Racket does with corrupt datagrams. Since the Racket docs don't mention the word checksum for the UDP segment, I need to know some things: * Does Racket just throw away corrupt datagrams? **