Hi Maciek,

yes, it is. Take a look at rackjure:

https://docs.racket-lang.org/rackjure/index.html#(part._dict-app)

Regards,

Ricardo


Am 08.09.2019 11:51 schrieb Maciek Godek:
Hi,
is it possible to take Racket's hash tables and sets, and make them
applicable (like in Clojure)?

So that, for example

(#hash((a . 1) (b . 2)) 'a)

would be equivalent to

(hash-ref #hash((a . 1) (b . 2)) 'a)

and

((set 1 2 3) 1)

would be equivalent to

(set-member? (set 1 2 3) 1)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Racket Users" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/879ae299-8f3f-4b9a-b13e-16727f347cb8%40googlegroups.com
[1].


Links:
------
[1]
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/879ae299-8f3f-4b9a-b13e-16727f347cb8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/ec470a8c6b41ff7d69d16c38877c591d%40posteo.de.

Reply via email to