Hi Alexander,
Thank you for the nice words, neighbor
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
> I'd be interested in trying a working prototype. It's hard to evaluate the
> wisdom of the technical choices without enjoying the benefits of the new
> interface.
Thank you for your interest. The implementation needs some fixes that I expect
to finish by the end of the week that starts
> I just meant: it's an approach that has worked before. "Better"? That's for
> you to decide.
Alright :)
Regarding the syntax of the DSL, I was intentionally vague about it in the
original post because I wanted to focus on the technical choices I made. But let
me expand on it a bit the means of
Hi, all.
Greg Trzeciak: I did not know about Garden, thank you for the reference. In
particular, I liked the way he talks about decoupling selectors and
declarations. It is something I have been doing in my CSS for a long time:
previously with SASS mixins, now with my library and calls to Racket
Hi, all.
I am working on an embedded DSL for CSS in Racket. I want to get feedback from
the community regarding the project’s goals and my choice of tools for
implementing it.
LANGUAGE
I want to use Racket to generate CSS for me. I am not interested in a “#lang”
language, but in a DSL that
1. On Section 14.4, The CK Machine, on page 243, there is a reference to
/part I(6.4)/, mentioning the specification for the CK Machine: "Comparing
the Redex specification with the specification in part I(6.4)".
But I believe /part I(6.4)/ is about the CEK Machine. The CK Machine is the
Thanks for adding the entry to the errata.
It was fun finding the bug in my version: I forgot to /unfreeze/ (call) the
function that represents the branches of the `if' statement. I used DrRacket's
visual tools—the stepper, the tracer and the debugger—to figure the issue.
Not only that, but I
Thanks for the blazing fast response and for clarifying it for me. Also, thanks
for acknowledgment; my name is Leandro Facchinetti.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Hi, all, and authors of SEwPR in particular.
I believe Exercise 15.1 has the following problems:
1. The function passed to the Y combinator should have an parameter
before `x' called `tri'.
2. `ifz' is not a construct in ISWIM as presented in the previous
chapters. I could extend the
Hi, all.
Why does the following typecheck:
#lang typed/racket
(provide group)
(define #:forall (A)
(group [list : (Listof A)]
[count : Exact-Positive-Integer]) : (Listof (Listof A))
(: group-step (All (A) ((Listof A) (Listof A) (Listof (Listof A)) ->
10 matches
Mail list logo
