Just thought I'd give everyone an update since it's been a little while. At
the moment I'm implementing my stripped-down language as a module language
that exports a subset of racket/base (and probably some other modules once
I get through the huge number of symbols in racket/base). Because "no
glo
This idea in general is very cool, so do let us (or at least me) know when
you've got a prototype working. I'm quite curious to see the inner workings.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece
Thanks for the pointer, Scott! I had been slowly coming to the conclusion I
was going to need to define a #lang, and I'd even run across your paper,
though I was holding out hope that there was some kind of shortcut for code
running in a sandbox. I definitely like the idea of being able to use
"reg
Hi Sean,
An alternative approach you might consider instead of relying heavily on
sandboxes and namespaces is to define your own #lang where you can
carefully control how different objects are allowed to communicate with
each other. This approach could have two advantages:
1) you can use lighter-w
Hi, folks. I'd like to implement an LPMUD-like multi-user programmable
environment in Racket. The idea is that an "object" would be a module plus
some state, similar to a gen_server in Erlang. Objects would each live in
their own sandbox and communicate with one another via message passing,
probabl
5 matches
Mail list logo
