I'm aware, and that's what I intended to do. There's the excellent
pmap package which uses futures, but I wanted threads for concurrency on
one CPU. It works very well for launching processes and getting the
returns all at once.
Dex
On 2019-04-24 6:09 p.m., Robby Findler wrote:
Thanks for
Thanks for working on this, but Racket's `thread` construct is not
parallel (in the sense that you will not see more than one CPU active
on your machine at a time with code that uses `thread`).
Check out places and futures for alternatives that do support parallelism.
Robby
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019
Hi folks,
I made concurrent (multi-threaded) versions of map, andmap and
for-each for Racket:
https://github.com/DexterLagan/pmap
Because I'm a little slow and lazy, I haven't checked packages for a
proper version.
If this isn't too much asking, can somebody give me some feedback?
3 matches
Mail list logo
