Kieron, hello.
On 4 Aug 2021, at 22:04, Kieron Hardy wrote:
I’m surprised no one has mentioned Rash so I will ... perhaps Rash
will be a useful tool for you ...
https://docs.racket-lang.org/rash/
“2 Rash Guide ... Rash is a shell language embedded in Racket. “
Thanks for pointing this
> started as a quick experiment with scsh a number of years ago,
I’m surprised no one has mentioned Rash so I will ... perhaps Rash will be a
useful tool for you ...
https://docs.racket-lang.org/rash/
“2 Rash Guide ... Rash is a shell language embedded in Racket. “
https://rash-lang.org/
Hi Norman,
> It's slightly unfortunate that Racket's
> start-up time make it slightly suboptimal as a command-line tool, but
> raco make helps with that.
With 8.0+/CS, even without make I've had a good experience. As you
say, setup or make makes things even faster, though.
If you weren't
Ben, hello.
On 4 Aug 2021, at 16:45, D. Ben Knoble wrote:
On a slightly unrelated note, if this for consumption by anyone other
than
just you, I would use (getenv "EDITOR") (or VISUAL, if you prefer)
rather
than hard-code the path to vi.
An excellent point.
In fact this is indeed a
> (exit (system*/exit-code "/usr/bin/vi" "filename"))
On a slightly unrelated note, if this for consumption by anyone other than
just you, I would use (getenv "EDITOR") (or VISUAL, if you prefer) rather
than hard-code the path to vi.
Best,
D. Ben Knoble
--
You received this message because
Many thanks for your thoughts, George and Shu-Hung.
Rather embarassingly, I've found my answer in what's almost the simplest
subprocess procedure:
(exit (system*/exit-code "/usr/bin/vi" "filename"))
exhibits the behaviour I want. That does all the required plumbing
flawlessly.
I'm
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:13 PM George Neuner wrote:
>
>
> On 8/3/2021 1:03 PM, Norman Gray wrote:
> > On 3 Aug 2021, at 17:38, George Neuner wrote:
> >
> >> Racket is multi-platform and tries to present a common API for
> >> dealing with underlying operating systems. Windows is an important
> >>
On 8/3/2021 1:03 PM, Norman Gray wrote:
On 3 Aug 2021, at 17:38, George Neuner wrote:
Racket is multi-platform and tries to present a common API for
dealing with underlying operating systems. Windows is an important
platform, but Windows does not have the concept of fork/exec ... so
George, hello.
On 3 Aug 2021, at 17:38, George Neuner wrote:
Racket is multi-platform and tries to present a common API for dealing
with underlying operating systems. Windows is an important platform,
but Windows does not have the concept of fork/exec ... so Racket
doesn't offer it
On 8/3/2021 12:14 PM, Norman Gray wrote:
Greetings.
I can't find a way of doing something equivalent to exec in Racket.
Is this Hard, or am I just missing it?
By 'exec', I mean the equivalent of replacing the process with a new
image, as distinct from `system` (and friends) or `process`
Greetings.
I can't find a way of doing something equivalent to exec in Racket. Is
this Hard, or am I just missing it?
By 'exec', I mean the equivalent of replacing the process with a new
image, as distinct from `system` (and friends) or `process` (and
friends), which are concerned with
11 matches
Mail list logo
