Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-10-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've adjusted pkgs.racket-lang.org to fix a problem with fetching the pkg-build status from pkg-build.racket-lang.org. That is, packages were being built and documentation was incorporated into docs.racket-lang.org, but pkgs.racket-lang.org wasn't reflecting that. (I didn't do more than try to

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-10-08 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
And while we are at the package website issue, can someone please take a look at my PR to fix the blank package bug ( https://github.com/racket/pkg-index/pull/29)? On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Sorawee Porncharoenwase < sorawee.pw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here’s additional information: I

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-10-08 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
Here’s additional information: I uploaded pprint-compact on September 22. https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/ briefly shows the documentation for a few days. But after a package update around September 26, the website no longer lists the documentation. The doc is still actually available at

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-10-08 Thread Siddhartha Kasivajhula
Looks like the try-catch package docs still aren't showing up . This might be a broader issue with the package index and docs, since I just renamed one of my packages that already had docs, and the docs now no longer exist on the package index

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-29 Thread David Storrs
Cool, thanks. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:23 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:20:47 -0400, David Storrs wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Matthew Flatt > wrote: > > > > > At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:27:53 +, Philip McGrath wrote: > > > > I haven't tried `raco setup` to

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-29 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:20:47 -0400, David Storrs wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:27:53 +, Philip McGrath wrote: > > > I haven't tried `raco setup` to look at its output, but one possible > > > improvement would be for whatever code

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-29 Thread David Storrs
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:27:53 +, Philip McGrath wrote: > > I haven't tried `raco setup` to look at its output, but one possible > > improvement would be for whatever code complains about the "invalid > `deps' > > specification" to always

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-29 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 29 Sep 2021 02:27:53 +, Philip McGrath wrote: > I haven't tried `raco setup` to look at its output, but one possible > improvement would be for whatever code complains about the "invalid `deps' > specification" to always report the invalid file's path. I've pushed that addition. --

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Philip McGrath
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman wrote: > On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > > $ raco pkg remove try-catch > > raco pkg remove: invalid `deps' specification > > specification: '("base" racket/format racket/string) > > > > That is not the deps specification from the info.rkt file so

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Robby Findler
I'm not quite following from the thread, but it sure sounds like there is a bug in raco setup (or similar) somewhere that isn't reporting an error properly. Is that the case? Robby On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 4:12 PM David Storrs wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman > wrote:

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:30 PM Ben Greenman wrote: > On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > > > Also, any ideas on why the remove fails? > > > > $ raco pkg remove try-catch > > raco pkg remove: invalid `deps' specification > > specification: '("base" racket/format racket/string) > > > > That is

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Ben Greenman
On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > *fists of rage* > > I'm glad it worked for you, and that it works for me if I repeat your > steps. I have no idea why it wasn't working given that I was using the > local copy of the git repository that is the source of what's on github. > Argh. Weird ... glad

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
*fists of rage* I'm glad it worked for you, and that it works for me if I repeat your steps. I have no idea why it wasn't working given that I was using the local copy of the git repository that is the source of what's on github. Argh. Regardless, thank you very much for your help. I've fixed

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
> > When I manually run > > $ cd try-catch/scribblings/ && scribble try-catch.scbl > > I get the try-catch.html file as expected but racket/base functions such > as with-handlers are not properly linked -- i.e. they appear in blue with a > red line under them and are not links. > - As I

Re: [racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread Ben Greenman
On 9/28/21, David Storrs wrote: > Summary: Documentation for a new module is not being generated when I > would expect it to be and when I do it manually it ends up not linking > basic Racket items. I've done a lot of searching to figure it out and > would appreciate some help. I cloned the

[racket-users] Having trouble getting documentation to generate

2021-09-28 Thread David Storrs
Summary: Documentation for a new module is not being generated when I would expect it to be and when I do it manually it ends up not linking basic Racket items. I've done a lot of searching to figure it out and would appreciate some help. Long version: I published a module a few days ago