Good point. Thank you.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:06 AM Jérôme Martin
wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 12:46:49 PM UTC+2, David Storrs wrote:
>>
>> Great, thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:35 AM Sorawee Porncharoenwase <
>> sorawe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Use either (... ...) or
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 12:46:49 PM UTC+2, David Storrs wrote:
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:35 AM Sorawee Porncharoenwase <
> sorawe...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Use either (... ...) or (quote-syntax ...).
>>
> Also if you are using syntax-parse, what I usually do is:
Great, thanks!
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:35 AM Sorawee Porncharoenwase <
sorawee.pw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use either (... ...) or (quote-syntax ...).
>
> See https://stackoverflow.com/a/38276476/718349
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM David Storrs
> wrote:
>
>> Assuming I would like a macro
Use either (... ...) or (quote-syntax ...).
See https://stackoverflow.com/a/38276476/718349
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM David Storrs wrote:
> Assuming I would like a macro to generate a match statement, like the
> following:
>
> (match foo
> [(list (vector x y z) ...) ])
>
> '...' al
Assuming I would like a macro to generate a match statement, like the
following:
(match foo
[(list (vector x y z) ...) ])
'...' already has a meaning for a syntax transformer and I'm not sure how
to tell it "no, this one should be inserted literally". I tried putting it
into a binding so
5 matches
Mail list logo