> Are there arguments against using multi-methods or other ways of building > generic (and extensible) dispatch? >
Just recently I have read blog post by Alexis King regarding safe multi-methods proof of concept that addresses "spooky action at a distance": http://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2016/02/18/simple-safe-multimethods-in-racket/ One could also try pattern matching to get multiple dispatch like here: http://r-wos.org/blog/racket-multiple-dispatch I personally like to structure my code utilizing multi-methods so am looking forward to the development in this area. I know too little of Racket to advise, but definitely like the direction Alexis' proof of concept is going into. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
