Re: [racket-users] Re: I Need Help Bringing Vulkan to Racket

2019-10-21 Thread Sage Gerard
Yes, see https://github.com/zyrolasting/racket-vulkan/blob/master/examples/minimal.rkt ~slg Original Message On Oct 21, 2019, 6:17 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 07:42:39PM +, Sage Gerard wrote: >> Thanks Paulo, I will follow up off-list. >> >> On-list:

Re: [racket-users] Re: I Need Help Bringing Vulkan to Racket

2019-10-21 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 07:42:39PM +, Sage Gerard wrote: > Thanks Paulo, I will follow up off-list. > > On-list: The bindings are now functional for the simplest possible Vulkan > instance > lifecycle (create, destroy, end of process). Does that mean there is something to test already, howe

Re: [racket-users] Re: I Need Help Bringing Vulkan to Racket

2019-10-21 Thread Sage Gerard
Thanks Paulo, I will follow up off-list. On-list: The bindings are now functional for the simplest possible Vulkan instance lifecycle (create, destroy, end of process). I'm having trouble learning how to create wrapper procedures that do not behave any differently from underlying C functions. R

Re: [racket-users] Re: I Need Help Bringing Vulkan to Racket

2019-10-21 Thread Leif Andersen
Oh cool. I've never actually looked at this dynamic-ffi package. Although IIRC, the RacketGL bindings themsleves were generated by swig: http://www.swig.org/ On 10/21/19, Paulo Matos wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 22:56:48 UTC+2, Sage Gerard wrote: >> >> I'm resuming work on a very ea

[racket-users] Re: I Need Help Bringing Vulkan to Racket

2019-10-21 Thread Paulo Matos
On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 22:56:48 UTC+2, Sage Gerard wrote: > > I'm resuming work on a very early-stage project that generates FFI > bindings for Vulkan in Racket [1]. VkTk is the closest relative project I > have found for reference [2]. > > Last time I was on the project I was focused on