On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:33 PM kamist...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I like the apply max instead of foldl, quite a bit easier.
>
> Instead of `(format "\t~a" (~a (~a k #:width width) v #:separator "\t"))`
> I prefer one of these:
> (~a "\t" (~a k #:width width) "\t" v)
> (~a #:separator "\t" "" (~a k
I like the apply max instead of foldl, quite a bit easier.
Instead of `(format "\t~a" (~a (~a k #:width width) v #:separator "\t"))` I
prefer one of these:
(~a "\t" (~a k #:width width) "\t" v)
(~a #:separator "\t" "" (~a k #:width width) v)
--
You received this message because you are
Wow, thank you Simon. That was above and beyond.
I should have thought of ~a to start with. With your pointers I came up
with a less flexible solution that is sufficient to the current issue:
#lang racket/base
(require racket/format
racket/string)
(define my-keys '("bacon" "eggs"
I am not really aware of a function that does this you could try digging
into the implementation of raise-arguments-error,
usually I roll my own implementation depending on what I really want to
output.
racket/format and its ~a, ~v, etc. have a lot of useful optional keyword
arguments like
4 matches
Mail list logo
