Hi Doug,
If you think they're a good starting point, I'm happy to contribute. I
would rather reinvent fewer things.
My impression from off-list conversation is that if the library is on
GitHub, and licensed appropriately (Apache 2, MIT, BSD, LGPL*, GPL*, MPL,
EPL, ISC, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, OFL,
Please do (rdf and tensorflow)! It seems we are duplicating our efforts at
the moment I have also been working on RDF4J (and other RDF tools) recently!
G.
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 6:57:40 PM UTC+1, m.douglas.williams wrote:
>
> Also, I hadn't known about the wiki you linked to. I can add
Also, I hadn't known about the wiki you linked to. I can add my inference
engine and interface to an RDF graph database (Eclipse rdf4j) interface
there.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019, 9:49 AM Greg Trzeciak Wasn't it a rhetorical question? :)
>
> Although I don't have use for TensorFlow at the moment - I
I have a start on them already, but they need work. I don't need them on my
project until the summer and they have been a low priority. I would be
happy to share them with anyone that wants to go at a faster pace.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019, 9:49 AM Greg Trzeciak Wasn't it a rhetorical question? :)
>
>
Wasn't it a rhetorical question? :)
Although I don't have use for TensorFlow at the moment - I would love to
have the FFI bindings ready for when I will finally need it.
The AI story in Racket at the moment is not as good is it could
be: https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/AI
On Monday,
That actually sounds kinda fun. If you make the repo I'll join in.
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 8:07:58 AM UTC-8, Matt Jadud wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> https://www.tensorflow.org/install/lang_c
>
> Would there be interest/value in having FFI bindings for TensorFlow? If I
> poke it with a stick,
6 matches
Mail list logo
