Re: [racket-users] Recommended workaround still the same?

2020-08-02 Thread Nate Griswold
Thanks Nate On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:50 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Yes, I think that's still the best approach. > > Sam > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:47 PM Nate Griswold > wrote: > > > > Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when > adding typed racket layer

Re: [racket-users] Recommended workaround still the same?

2020-08-02 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Yes, I think that's still the best approach. Sam On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:47 PM Nate Griswold wrote: > > Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when > adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings. > > Is this

[racket-users] Recommended workaround still the same?

2020-08-02 Thread Nate Griswold
Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings. Is this (https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/766) still the recommended way of working around the issue? Nate -- You received this message because you are