Re: [racket-users] Self contained executables

2015-03-27 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:42:03 -0700 (PDT), John Carmack wrote: > I want to be able to build simple (windows) utilities for other team > members that don't have Racket installed. The archive-with-dlls > option is better than nothing, but it would be a whole lot better to > have a single statically li

[racket-users] Self contained executables

2015-03-27 Thread John Carmack
I want to be able to build simple (windows) utilities for other team members that don't have Racket installed. The archive-with-dlls option is better than nothing, but it would be a whole lot better to have a single statically linked exe. In this case, it is a 13 MB executable, and only 5 MB o