On 03/08/2015 07:22, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Michael Titke wrote on 08/03/2015 12:50 AM:
Perhaps /quote/ and /eval/ would do the job? That is the usual way to
treat Scheme code as data and data as Scheme code.
Eval might indeed be the perfect solution this time, iff every other
conceivable
2015-08-02 19:12 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Weitz konstantin.we...@gmail.com:
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From
my current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place
over a channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any
Note that the web-server has support for serializable closures:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server-internal/closure.html
I think they are the practical choice.
/Jens Axel
2015-08-03 12:29 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard jensa...@soegaard.net:
2015-08-02 19:12 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Weitz
On 02/08/2015 19:12, Konstantin Weitz wrote:
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by `place-message-allowed?`.
I would like to send
Michael Titke wrote on 08/03/2015 12:50 AM:
Perhaps /quote/ and /eval/ would do the job? That is the usual way to
treat Scheme code as data and data as Scheme code.
Eval might indeed be the perfect solution this time, iff every other
conceivable alternative has been rejected. :)
Shameless
6 matches
Mail list logo
