No strace on Android, unfortunately.
From: Marc Burns [mailto:m4bu...@uwaterloo.ca]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:10 PM
To: John Carmack
Cc: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket-users] Startup times
Here’s the result of `strace -c -f -- racket -l racket/base` for Racket 6.1.1.8
on my Linux
Here’s the result of `strace -c -f -- racket -l racket/base` for Racket 6.1.1.8
on my Linux workstation:
% time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall
-- --- --- - -
99.080.004000 571 7 nanosleep
gt; From: Marc Burns [mailto:m4bu...@uwaterloo.ca]
> > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:10 PM
> > To: John Carmack
> > Cc: Racket Users
> > Subject: Re: [racket-users] Startup times
> >
> >
> >
> > Here’s the result of `strace -c -f -- racket -l racket/base`
I am experimenting with running racket natively on Android to compare with my
current embedded Chibi scheme implementation. It would be convenient to just
leave racket as a separate process and communicate over sockets/pipes so it
exactly mimics my remote development case.
The startup time to
Set the environment variable PLTSTDERR=debug to get more verbose output.
Startup involves traversing all the bytecode files that comprise the base
environment. How fast is filesystem access on the Note 4 compared to PC? You
could use strace to find the latency on different system calls made
a]
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:10 PM
> To: John Carmack
> Cc: Racket Users
> Subject: Re: [racket-users] Startup times
>
>
>
> Here’s the result of `strace -c -f -- racket -l racket/base` for Racket
> 6.1.1.8 on my Linux workstation:
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
