On Monday, November 30, 2015 at 10:52:05 AM UTC-5, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> When you use a REPL, like if you launch racket at the command-line, you are
> using the top-level:
>
> Welcome to Racket v6.3.0.6.
> -> (begin-for-syntax (displayln (syntax-local-context)))
> top-level
>
> (or if
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, but this has been bothering me... the
Reference refers in various places to top-level variables and bindings that
apparently excludes module bodies, as in section 1.2.1: "A top-level binding is
a binding from a definition at the top-level; a module
On 2015-11-30 06:55:44 -0800, brendan wrote:
> But I can’t figure out how such a thing can exist,
> because Racket always insists that any definitions I write must be inside a
> module, either implicitly via #lang, or explicitly. It seems like the only
> possible top-level form is a module form.
On Monday, November 30, 2015 at 1:07:32 PM UTC-5, Alex Knauth wrote:
> Maybe this would be more accurate then:
>
> #lang racket
> (define-syntax context
> (lambda (stx)
> (println (syntax-local-context))
> #'(void)))
> (context)
Great! Thank you.
--
You received this message because
4 matches
Mail list logo
