You might have a look at Whalesong. It is a racket-js compiler that,
IMO, was headed in a good direction. It's not a small thing, however.
Robby
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
Thanks, Jens Axel, Raoul, and Robby.
Different question... For support
2015-06-05 6:37 GMT+02:00 Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org:
2. Forget about `eval`, require apps to be compilable on development host
(but not necessarily runnable there), implement compiler from `.zo` to JS
(managing TCO, etc.), implement small Racket runtime library in JS,
implement
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard jensa...@soegaard.net
wrote:
2015-06-05 6:37 GMT+02:00 Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org:
2. Forget about `eval`, require apps to be compilable on development host
(but not necessarily runnable there), implement compiler from `.zo` to JS
I recall Whalesong, and was hoping something simpler would work.
Robby Findler wrote on 06/05/2015 08:21 AM:
You might have a look at Whalesong. It is a racket-js compiler that,
IMO, was headed in a good direction. It's not a small thing, however.
--
You received this message because you are
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
Thanks, Jens Axel, Raoul, and Robby.
Different question... For support for writing polished Web browser (and
PhoneGap) apps in Racket, any comments on which of the following two options
is better (viable, easier to
Ah, sorry.
I think it would be a great thing if it were possible to have
something simpler that did Whalesong's job. I feel like this is
possible and something we're moving slowly towards as we chip away at
moving parts of the runtime system up into Racket proper.
Robby
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at
Thanks, Jens Axel, Raoul, and Robby.
Different question... For support for writing polished Web browser (and
PhoneGap) apps in Racket, any comments on which of the following two
options is better (viable, easier to implement and maintain, better
performance, etc.)?
1. Implement Racket VM in
How hard is it to implement the Racket virtual machine (no JIT) for a
single target architecture one knows?
Say, is this a one-weekend task, or a one-month task?
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Racket
Users group.
To unsubscribe from this
Depends. If you count all the primitives - then one-month won't be enough.
The actual operations of the virtual machine are certainly doable in a
reasonable amount of time.
A Racket VM written in Racket:
https://github.com/soegaard/meta/blob/master/runtime/racket-eval.rkt
(submodules not
Evil question: Has anybody ever looked at how the bytecode could be
interpreted on another VM e.g. JVM?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Just because no one has mentioned it yet: there is a C implementation
of the VM (and the primitives) so if you have a C compiler and an OS
for that architecture, it shouldn't be too hard.
Robby
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Neil Van Dyke n...@neilvandyke.org wrote:
How hard is it to implement
11 matches
Mail list logo
