Correction: "see which Scheme implementations come out with *Wasm* backends"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
caleb wrote on 9/21/19 11:27 AM
I'm a bit of a Racket noob--how extensive of a project is it to get Racket
running on x R6RS scheme?
I think there's a number of ways to do that, and to scope it, and I want
to just put some initial thoughts out there, rather than propose
requirements and
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:27:04AM -0600, caleb wrote:
> This is awesome.
>
> I'm a bit of a Racket noob--how extensive of a project is it to get
> Racket running on x R6RS scheme?
If you mean running R6RS scheme on Racket,
I suspect it's as simple as starting with
#lang r6rs
instead of
This is awesome.
I'm a bit of a Racket noob--how extensive of a project is it to get
Racket running on x R6RS scheme?
Neil Van Dyke writes:
> FYI, a proof-of-concept of compiling a good subset of Scheme to WebAssembly:
>
> https://github.com/google/schism
>
> It relies on two experimental(?)
FYI, a proof-of-concept of compiling a good subset of Scheme to WebAssembly:
https://github.com/google/schism
It relies on two experimental(?) Wasm features, one of them for PITCH:
https://github.com/google/schism#schism-uses-experimental-webassembly-features
via
5 matches
Mail list logo
