In my opinion, it is too hard, not too easy to synthesize such syntax
objects. After all, I can make ports and I can call read-syntax (which
is what I end up doing sometimes, annoyingly). The point is that
syntax-original? implies that DrRacket treats the syntax objects
differently. Most of the
Is it a good idea that we can synthesize “original looking code”?
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 4:48 PM, Alexis King wrote:
>
> To understand this, note that (syntax-original? stx) is only #t when
> *both* of the following things are true:
>
> 1. stx has the special, opaque
2 matches
Mail list logo