Re: [racket-users] tilda - a threading macro full of itself

> On May 7, 2019, at 1:29 PM, zeRusski wrote: > > It just names the threaded value. Did I overlook anything? > > That's right, nothing fancy. Think let-binding the threaded value at that > point. #:with id ~ would achieve the same thing, so as it is now #:as is > redundant. With #:do both #:

Re: [racket-users] tilda - a threading macro full of itself

> > It just names the threaded value. Did I overlook anything? That's right, nothing fancy. Think let-binding the threaded value at that point. #:with id ~ would achieve the same thing, so as it is now #:as is redundant. With #:do both #:with and #:as are redundant, really. > Let me point o

Re: [racket-users] tilda - a threading macro full of itself

> > It just names the threaded value. Did I overlook anything? That's right, nothing fancy. Think let-binding the threaded value at that point. #:with id ~ would achieve the same thing, so as it is now #:as is redundant. With #:do both #:with and #:as are redundant, really. > Let me point o

Re: [racket-users] tilda - a threading macro full of itself

> On May 7, 2019, at 9:39 AM, zeRusski wrote: > > I asked in a separate thread how one debugs set of scopes in Racket macros. I > appreciate the question may read a bit hand-wavy and abstract, so I split out > the piece of code I had in mind into a separate package so that interested > Rack

[racket-users] tilda - a threading macro full of itself

I asked in a separate thread how one debugs set of scopes in Racket macros. I appreciate the question may read a bit hand-wavy and abstract, so I split out the piece of code I had in mind into a separate package so that interest