In addition, some time ago I did use futures which did parallelization very
well when using distinct parts of the same vector. I did not need unsafe for
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
it will access. But for (very) primitive
arithmetic functions this should be an avoidable problem, I think.
Just my single one cent.
From: Robby Findler
Sent: 17 June 2020 17:23
To: Brian Adkins
Cc: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket-users] Re: trying to use futures for some calculations
On Wed, Jun 17
I've looked at it only briefly (it's the end of the semester and grading
is due soon).
> I would *love* to be proven wrong on this, but I think it's rare to
> be able to get decent parallelization in practice using futures. You
> may have better results using places, but it will
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:56 AM Brian Adkins wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 4:50:44 AM UTC-4, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>> I am trying to speed up an algorithm using futures, but I am getting some
>> unexpected results (and no real speed improvements), and I was wondering if
Mail list logo