Re: [racket-users] package-build status for upcoming release

Here's Matthew's summary from before, annotated as with the first summary: Summary of failures relative to v6.2.1 -- Fixed: cKanren control java-lexer profj racquel set-exp get-bonus heresy honu jack-mock bystroTeX alexknauth-my-object Failure

Re: [racket-users] racket users fight for their right to colon keywords

On 10/23/2015 11:30 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote: > If you touch type you > use both left and right shift keys O_o. ...but only the right shift key in dvorak, but seriously Asumu mentioned Flatt and Barzilay's "Keyword and optional arguments in PLT Scheme" on irc last night:

Re: [racket-users] package-build status for upcoming release

There are also two new errors in this run, both of which look like Racket bugs: unicode-properties (out of memory error) midi-readwrite (segfault) Sam On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Here's Matthew's summary from before, annotated as with

Re: [racket-users] package-build status for upcoming release

At Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:47:36 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:07:09 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > Here's an updated build with the current release candidate: > > > > > > http://release-pkg-build.racket-lang.org.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ > > > > Lots of results

Re: [racket-users] racket users fight for their right to colon keywords

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote: On 10/23/2015 11:30 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote: If you touch type you use both left and right shift keys O_o. ...but only the right shift key in dvorak For greater keyboard layout awareness, here is a more complete assessment

Re: [racket-users] Slideshow in HD

At Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:09:32 -0700, Byron Davies wrote: > But perhaps we can just parameterize screen-w and screen-h? Would that > require more than a pass through the source code to change the variables > screen-w and screen-h to parameter calls (screen-w) and (screen-h)? Unfortunately, there

Re: [racket-users] Sundials FFI wrapper

Hi Alexey, On 2015-10-22 10:08:52 +0200, Alexey Cherkaev wrote: >Is there anybody who has done something similar in Racket for other C >libraries? And who will be interested in creating the wrapper for >Sundials? (PS. I don’t feel my expertise are up to scratch to tackle it on >my

Re: [racket-users] package-build status for upcoming release

p.s. Meanwhile I can of course use the browser search-in-page, especially on a desktop browser. My preceding email is more of a nice-to-have request. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote: > In the future would it be possible to sort this by package

Re: [racket-users] package-build status for upcoming release

That was going to be my next question, after a couple of the errors didn't make sense to me, and I finally now noticed the May 2015 date. :) Standing down On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:07:09 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:

Re: [racket-users] racket users fight for their right to colon keywords

Keyword arguments: Although I'm comfortable in the #: camp, I can understand people preferring :foo over #:foo for the reason that it is faster to type. #: requires two shifted chars. If you touch type you use both left and right shift keys O_o. In that respect #: is even more awkward a finger