[racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

Hi, I have installed racket on my Android tablet. For this I have the device rooted and installed a chrooted Archlinux, which in turn provides the prebuild racket-package 6.6. By the way: The tablet has a x86 iIntel CPU but nothing "big iron"-like. About 400MB free RAM is available. BUT: When I

Re: [racket-users] degenerate performance in syntax-parse

On 10/21/2016 05:50 PM, Dan Liebgold wrote: Hi all - In the process of putting together a somewhat complex application using syntax-parse, I discovered that when I specified a repeated pattern in a syntax-class (which was incorrect) AND I had a certain usage of the syntax transformer with an

Re: [racket-users] link: bad variable linkage

As of now, I haven't experienced any more problem of this sort since then. Admittedly I haven't tried hard either to reproduce this behavior. So thank you so much for the time you took to look into this! Very appreciated. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Robby Findler

Re: [racket-users] Re: opinions on YAML as communication tool

On 21/10/2016 23:00, Jack Firth wrote: If you'd still like to use yaml, I would like to quietly point out that each of the following is a valid boolean value in yaml: ... Google for "YAML Norway" for some real-life illustrations of this problem. The ISO country code for Norway is "no",

[racket-users] help

please help me , i start on racket and i should write a little programm "digital clock" in exercice . i have just a book without answer to help me . this is what i write . please correct me and give the good answer ! : (define (horloge-numerique T) (local [(define LARG 100)

[racket-users] n things in one go and: How to search for something unkown?

Hi, A more general question: I am no native english speaker and a newbie when it comes to Racker/Lisp/Functional programming. Suppose I want the name of a function or functionality (like this genious 'apply map' algorithm to hurry through a list of lists) - how/where can I search for it if I

Re: [racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

Hi Meino, have a look at this FAQ: http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/FAQ.html#%28part._.How_can_.I_install_a_package_without_its_documentation_%29 For some packages there exist two "sub" packages: One with "...-lib" which does not contain any documentation and does not depend on scribble etc. and

Re: [racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

I'll bring that FAQ up-to-date to explain that built packages are now provided by the catalog https://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/server/built/catalog/ See also https://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/about.html At Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:16:02 +0200, Daniel Brunner wrote: > Hi Meino, > > have a look

Re: [racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

Asumu Takikawa [16-10-23 18:12]: > Hi Meino, > > On 2016-10-23 11:09:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > It there any way to tell raco what kind > > of doc processing is wanted and what don't? > > In addition to Daniel's answer, there is a temporary workaround you

Re: [racket-users] raco run but (please) dont process the docs

Hi Meino, On 2016-10-23 11:09:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > It there any way to tell raco what kind > of doc processing is wanted and what don't? In addition to Daniel's answer, there is a temporary workaround you can do which is to install a package with the --no-setup flag like this:

[racket-users] flat-contract-with-reason (should be flat-contract-with-explanation ?)

The Racket Reference documents a function "flat-contract-with-reason"; however, in #lang racket, I get an unbound identifier error for "flat-contract-with-reason". I noticed that racket/contract/base does export a function

Re: [racket-users] flat-contract-with-reason (should be flat-contract-with-explanation ?)

Thanks. I've pushed a fix (to the docs). Robby On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Philip McGrath wrote: > The Racket Reference documents a function "flat-contract-with-reason"; > however, in #lang racket, I get an unbound identifier error for >