ECOOP/PLDI 2017 in Barcelona / Call for Student Participation
http://conf.researchr.org/home/pldi-ecoop-2017
Interested in hearing the latest about Scala, Perl, Clojure, Rust,
Swift, JavaScript, and many many other languages and systems?
Curious about new ideas such as gradual types, JIT compile
Is there a simple way to lift a `require` form to the top level of a module?
i.e., in the example below, is there something that would replace
`WHAT-MAGIC-GOES-HERE?` to make it work?
I understand that `syntax-local-lift-expression` won't work.
But `syntax-local-lift-require`, as best I can di
On Monday, 27 February 2017 16:40:50 UTC-5, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> Is there a simple way to lift a `require` form to the top level of a module?
> i.e., in the example below, is there something that would replace
> `WHAT-MAGIC-GOES-HERE?` to make it work?
>
> I understand that `syntax-local-
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:51 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> You don't want local-require?
I don't think so — the `require` forms can be nested anywhere in the program. I
want them to jump to the top level, and have their usual "global" effect.
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 5:34 PM, gfb wrote:
>
> If y
At Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:43:28 -0800, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> > On Feb 27, 2017, at 5:34 PM, gfb wrote:
> >
> > If you want that to be equivalent to having `(require
> > math/number-theory)` at the top-level then I'm not sure the precise
> > semantics: should it affect the meaning of already-tra
5 matches
Mail list logo
