Thanks for your helpful reply. I've created GitHub issues
https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/691 and
https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/692 to track the bugs, and I
will try my hand at a pull request for `parse-command-line` if I have time
before you do.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018
Hey all,
I'm very interested in using Racket for the purposes of numerical analysis.
Specifically, I am interested in using Racket as my test bed for
implementing simple numerical algorithms which operate on IEEE 754 single
precision floats and compare those results against a ground truth,
Hopefully someone who's tried this sort of thing will be able to give you a
better answer, but, from my quick poking around, it seems that, while there
is not a special library like racket/flonum for single-precision, Racket's
generic number operations (like +) work on single-precision floats and
On 4/9/2018 7:11 PM, d...@insomniacgames.com wrote:
I'm very interested in using Racket for the purposes of numerical
analysis. Specifically, I am interested in using Racket as my test bed
for implementing simple numerical algorithms which operate on IEEE 754
single precision floats and
For the applications I work on, double precision floats are too costly to
use; although the CPU cycle count to operate on doubles tend to be the same
as single precision floats on modern hardware, the bandwidth cost is too
prohibitive. We really do need single precision floats, and in many
5 matches
Mail list logo
