Den ons. 27. maj 2020 kl. 19.27 skrev George Neuner :
>
> On 5/27/2020 6:34 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> >
> > In standard Racket an application doesn't communicate how many values
> > a function is expected to produce.
>
> You can ask: see procedure-result-arity
>
On 5/26/2020 10:36 PM, Robert Postill wrote:
Inspired by the reply to
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62014612/how-to-test-a-racket-package-self-sufficiently, I
decided to ask the question here. So a little background to the
discussion. I've been looking at a racket package, and the
I'm working on #lang with a custom reader (via read-table extension), that
among other things, defines custom syntax for duodecimal numbers.
My reader is working great in the definitions window / when I hut "Run" in
DrRacket, and the top of the interaction window shows the name of my #lang,
Den ons. 27. maj 2020 kl. 19.56 skrev Hendrik Boom :
> Is there an accepted convention about how to use a symbol used in a
> program within a comment so it's clear the comment is using it as a
> program symbol and not as an ordinary English word?
>
Not sure. Sometimes I surround the symbol with
I have a multi-collection package and I wanted to exclude a certain
directory (plisqin-test) from being a package. I found the relevant
documentation here: https://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/strip.html.
The first thing I tried was simply adding a `~` to the end of the
directory. This worked.
On 5/27/2020 6:34 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
In standard Racket an application doesn't communicate how many values
a function is expected to produce.
You can ask: see procedure-result-arity
https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/procedures.html
I have written a small
Is there an accepted convention about how to use a symbol used in a
program within a comment so it's clear the comment is using it as a
program symbol and not as an ordinary English word?
-- hendrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users"
I use markdown syntax for that:
The function `function` functions like `functions` but for a single
function `proc`.
I've seen others use `function' instead.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:04 PM Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> Den ons. 27. maj 2020 kl. 19.56 skrev Hendrik Boom >:
>
>> Is there an
On 5/27/2020 1:50 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
Den ons. 27. maj 2020 kl. 19.27 skrev George Neuner
mailto:gneun...@comcast.net>>:
On 5/27/2020 6:34 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
> In standard Racket an application doesn't communicate how many
values
> a function is
Dear All, i'm a new member in the group and also a debutante in racket
programming and i will be happy if you read and understand what i'm asking .
I want create a finite state machine to represent an hotel room booking
system.
first , i have created the FSM Scheme as the following :
about
10 matches
Mail list logo