On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:58 AM Štěpán Němec wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:23:03 -0400
> Jon Zeppieri wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Does that mean that for higher-order function parameters, inst expects
> >> only the return type signature, not that of the function itself?
> >
> > The main point here
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:23:03 -0400
Jon Zeppieri wrote:
[...]
>> Does that mean that for higher-order function parameters, inst expects
>> only the return type signature, not that of the function itself?
>
> The main point here is that `inst` needs substitutions for the type
> _variables_, not for
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:59 AM Štěpán Němec wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:40:03 -0400
> Jon Zeppieri wrote:
>
> > (curry (inst map (U Complex False) String)
> > string->number)
> >
> > ... typechecks, but in your expression, you're going to need to handle
> > the possibility that the
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:40:03 -0400
Jon Zeppieri wrote:
> (curry (inst map (U Complex False) String)
> string->number)
>
> ... typechecks, but in your expression, you're going to need to handle
> the possibility that the pattern variables in `list-rest` pattern are
> #f.
Many thanks for t
(curry (inst map (U Complex False) String)
string->number)
... typechecks, but in your expression, you're going to need to handle
the possibility that the pattern variables in `list-rest` pattern are
#f.
- Jon
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 4:15 PM Štěpán Němec wrote:
>
>
> I have a hard time
I have a hard time persuading Typed Racket to accept the expression
"(curry map string->number)". No amount of type annotations or added
`inst`s (as recommended by the guide[1]) I could come up with seem to
help.
Is there a way to make it work?
[1]
https://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-guide/caveats
6 matches
Mail list logo
