On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:57 PM, lu wrote:
> --enable-shared create shared libraries (ok, but not recommended)
> --enable-dynlib same as --enable-shared
I haven't personally compiled Racket before, but these seem to be the
flags you are looking for. It
Thanks. That's interesting. So below are the flags `configure --help` offers. I
don't see anything specific to link racket statically. Any hint?
`configure' configures this package to adapt to many kinds of systems.
Usage: ./configure [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
To assign environment variables
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 12:33:46 PM UTC-7, lu wrote:
> In fact, I'm wondering if `raco distribute` or `raco exe` is flexible enough
> to produce a statically linked executable where all the necessary dlls are
I believe this is possible, but probably not worth the effort
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 11:24:50 AM UTC-8, Shu-Hung You wrote:
> Sorry, I saw that you're already using raco exe and raco distribute.
> So is the problem related to some DLL issue on Windows?
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Shu-Hung You
Sorry, I saw that you're already using raco exe and raco distribute.
So is the problem related to some DLL issue on Windows?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Shu-Hung You
> Is raco exe in this
Is raco exe in this page what you want? Just type
> raco exe q.rkt
And this command will produce a single executable. Now we can now run
q: expects 1 on the command line, given 0 arguments
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:12 PM, lu
Hi all, I have this little toy project to help me learn the language. I
would like to produce a single portable executable that can be executed without
reliance on racket installation. `raco distribute` does produce a "package"
folder. But for small utility tool like this, I would prefer a
Mail list logo