Re: [racket-users] I made some videos about Racket (a.k.a the return of Playing the Game with PLT Redex)

> ... to embed domain specific language in another. Does Racket have any support for this? One approach is discussed in our paper about making macro-extensible DSLs: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3428297 Section 8 shows some examples of how extensibility is useful for layering

Re: [racket-users] I made some videos about Racket (a.k.a the return of Playing the Game with PLT Redex)

Thanks for sharing. I think you did mention an interesting idea, to embed domain specific language in another. Does Racket have any support for this? Leandro Facchinetti 於 2021年1月6日 週三 上午3:20寫道： > Thanks to everyone who responded (privately and otherwise) for the nice > words. > > Sage Gerard:

Re: [racket-users] I made some videos about Racket (a.k.a the return of Playing the Game with PLT Redex)

Thanks to everyone who responded (privately and otherwise) for the nice words. Sage Gerard: To each its own. I’m glad to hear that you have these success cases with Racket  -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [racket-users] I made some videos about Racket (a.k.a the return of Playing the Game with PLT Redex)

Thanks for sharing. I honed in on the review video because I like the philosophical discussions that come from them. I'm not sure about the comments re: toxicity in the community and how that helps one succeed in academia, but I did see some value in discussing the merits of LOP. I spent

[racket-users] I made some videos about Racket (a.k.a the return of Playing the Game with PLT Redex)

Hi all, Here are the videos: Playing the Game with PLT Redex: https://youtu.be/NszLQNROdw0 Understanding the Type of call/cc: https://youtu.be/7Zkt_IJaYOY Racket: Why I Think It’s a Great Language, and Why I’m Not Using It Anymore: https://youtu.be/_wY7FBtr7_c The first two used to be articles