Re: [racket-users] Implementation of threading macros

The `~>` form provided by the `threading` package is a macro, and it treats parentheses differently than a normal function would. What you are looking for is probably the ~> *function*, provided by the `point-free` package. That has simpler behavior, doing what you expect with lambdas, curried

[racket-users] Implementation of threading macros

Hi, everyone. I think that racket threading macros can mix with expressions(lambda, curry, class, ...), but not in fact. #lang racket (require threading) (define (add2 x) (+ x 2)) (~> 1 add2) ; ok (~> 1 (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) ; ng (~> 1 (curry + 2)) ; ng (define adder% (class object%