Re: [racket-users] Re: Breaking change to package 'handy'

2018-04-24 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:09 PM, David Storrs wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour > wrote: >> FWIW, this `multi-partition` sounds a lot like the built-in `group-by`. > > It has significant extra processing options:

Re: [racket-users] Re: Breaking change to package 'handy'

2018-04-24 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > FWIW, this `multi-partition` sounds a lot like the built-in `group-by`. It has significant extra processing options: ;Examples: ; (multi-partition #:partitions 4 #:source '(a b c d e f)) ;

Re: [racket-users] Re: Breaking change to package 'handy'

2018-04-24 Thread Vincent St-Amour
FWIW, this `multi-partition` sounds a lot like the built-in `group-by`. Vincent On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:55:26 -0500, David Storrs wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Storrs wrote: > > The list-utils function in the 'handy' package includes > >

[racket-users] Re: Breaking change to package 'handy'

2018-04-24 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:54 AM, David Storrs wrote: > The list-utils function in the 'handy' package includes > 'multi-partition', which is like the built-in 'partition' except that > it can partition into any number of groups. This function used to > have multiple