Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Docker images from Alpine

2016-07-13 Thread Marc Burns
Hi Juan, > Great work!. Just a few comments: > ... Thank you; I've integrated your suggestions. I'll open a PR to get rid of these patches when I come back to this tonight. I've pushed a new image. Cheers, Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[racket-users] Re: Racket Docker images from Alpine

2016-07-13 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On 13/07/16 05:20, Marc Burns wrote: Hi all, I remember this topic came up on the list a while back. I've made a Docker image of the latest Racket from alpine 3.3 with just musl libc. I had to monkey patch some Racket internals to get this working, so it might be badly and subtly broken.

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket Docker images from Alpine

2016-07-13 Thread Daniel Brunner
Am 13.07.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Jack Firth: > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 8:20:55 PM UTC-7, m4burns wrote: >> >> Enjoy! >> >> Marc > > This is fantastic! I'm glad somebody figured out how to do this. Those more > familiar with Racket's internals can comment on what implications using musl >

[racket-users] Re: Racket Docker images from Alpine

2016-07-13 Thread Jack Firth
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 8:20:55 PM UTC-7, m4burns wrote: > Hi all, > > I remember this topic came up on the list a while back. I've made a > Docker image of the latest Racket from alpine 3.3 with just musl libc. I > had to monkey patch some Racket internals to get this working, so it >